Main Article Content
As a hypothetical approach, strong interaction without repulsive forces can be assumed to be equivalent to a large gravitational coupling. Based on this concept, strong coupling constant can be defined as a ratio of the electromagnetic force and the gravitational force associated with proton, neutron, up quark and down quark. With respect to the product of strong coupling constant and fine structure ratio, we review our recently proposed two semi empirical relations and coefficients 0.00189 and 0.00642 connected with nuclear stability and binding energy. We wish to emphasize that- by classifying nucleons as ‘free nucleons’ and ‘active nucleons’, nuclear binding energy can be fitted with a new class of ‘three term’ formula having one unique energy coefficient. Based on the geometry and quantum nature, currently believed harmonic oscillator and spin orbit magic numbers can be considered as the lower and upper “mass limits” of quark clusters.
Ghahramany N. et al. New approach to nuclear binding energy in integrated nuclear model. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Physics. 2012;6:3.
Tanabashi M, et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D. 2018;98:030001.
Tennakone K. Electron, muon, proton, and strong gravity. Phys. Rev. D. 1974;10:1722.
Sivaram C, Sinha K. Strong gravity, black holes, and hadrons. Physical Review D. 1977;16(6):1975-1978.
De Sabbata V, Gasperini M. Strong gravity and weak interactions. Gen. Relat. Gravit. 1979;10(9):731-741.
Salam A, Sivaram C. Strong gravity approach to QCD and confinement. Mod. Phys. Lett. 1993;A8(4):321–326.
Roberto Onofrio. On weak interactions as short-distance manifestations of gravity. Modern Physics Letters A 28. 2013;1350022.
Seshavatharam UVS, Lakshminarayana S. On the role of squared neutron number in reducing nuclear binding energy in the light of electromagnetic, weak and nuclear gravitational constants – A review. Asian Journal of Research and Reviews in Physics. 2019;2(3):1- 22.
Roy Chowdhury P, et al. Modified bethe-weizsacker mass formula with isotonic shift and new driplines. Mod. Phys. Lett. 2005;A20:1605-1618.
Zhang W, et al. Magic numbers for super heavy nuclei in relativistic continuum Hartree–Bogoliubov theory, Nuclear Physics A. 2005;753(1-2):106-135.
Bohr A, Mottelson BR. Nuclear Structure. W. A. Benjamin Inc., New York, Amesterdam. 1969;1.
Cht. Mavrodiev S, Deliyergiyev MA. Modification of the nuclear landscape in the inverse problem framework using the generalized Bethe-Weizsäcker mass formula. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E27: 1850015; 2018.
Xia XW et al. The limits of the nuclear landscape explored by the relativistic continuum Hatree-Bogoliubov theory. Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables. 2018;121-122:1-215.
Mollera P, Sierka AJ, Ichikawab T, Sagawa H. Nuclear ground-state masses and deformations: FRDM(2012). Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables. 2016;109–110:1-204.
Seshavatharam UVS, Lakshminarayana S. On the role of large nuclear gravity in understanding strong coupling constant, nuclear stability range, binding energy of isotopes and magic proton numbers – A critical review. J. Nucl. Phys. Mat. Sci. Rad. A. 2019;6(2):142–160.
Seshavatharam UVS, Lakshminarayana S. On the role of four gravitational constants in nuclear structure. Mapana Journal of Sciences. 2019;18(1):21-45.
Seshavatharam UVS, Lakshminarayana S. Implications and applications of fermi scale quantum gravity. International Astronomy and Astrophysics Research Journal. 2020;2(1):13-30.
Bagge E. Der Schalenbau der Atomkerne (The shell structure of the nuclei) Naturwissenschaften. 1948;35:376.
Mayer MG. On closed shells in nuclei. Phys. Rev. 1948;74:235.
Raj K, Gupta et al. Magic numbers in exotic light nuclei near drip lines. J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 2006;32:565–571.
Ghahramany N, et al. Quark-gluon plasma model and origin of magic numbers. Iranian Physical Journal. 2007;1-2:35-38.
Santhosh KP, Biju RK. Neutron and proton shell closure in the super heavy region via cluster radioactivity in 280−314116 isotopes. Pramana. J. Phys. 2009;72(4): 689-707.
Steppenbeck D, et al. Evidence for a new nuclear ‘magic number’ from the level structure of 54Ca. Nature. 2013;502:207–210.
Nakada H, Sugiura K. Predicting magic numbers of nuclei with semi-realistic nucleon–nucleon interactions. Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 033D02. 2014;17.
Tran DT, et al. Evidence for prevalent Z = 6 magic number in neutron-rich carbon isotopes. Nat Commun. 2018;9: 1594.
Xu X, et al. Masses of neutron-rich 52–54Sc and 54,56Ti nuclides: The N=32 sub shell closure in scandium. Phys. Rev. C. 2019;99(6).
Chen S, et al. Quasifree neutron knockout from 54Ca corroborates arising N=34 neutron magic number. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019;123:142501.
Seshavatharam UVS, Lakshminarayana S. 4G Model of Fractional Charge Strong-Weak Super Symmetry. International Astronomy and Astrophysics Research Journal. 2020;2(1):xx-xx
Seshavatharam UVS, Lakshminarayana S. Super symmetry in strong and weak interactions. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E. 2010;19(2):263-280.
Gross DJ, Wilczek F. Ultraviolet behavior of non-abelian gauge theories. Physical Review Letters. 1973;30(26): 1343– 1346.
Politzer HD. Reliable perturbative results for strong interactions. Physical Review Letters. 1973;30(26):1346–1349.